<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to Give the Virtual Boot to Arbitrageurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:01:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Duckett</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4348</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Duckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-4348</guid>
		<description>It`s a very grey area and one i think google would find hard to prove unless it wsa a gross abuse of the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It`s a very grey area and one i think google would find hard to prove unless it wsa a gross abuse of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why Google would have a problem with this. They make money off the Adwords Ads and then make money whenever someone makes money off AdSense so where is the problem for Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why Google would have a problem with this. They make money off the Adwords Ads and then make money whenever someone makes money off AdSense so where is the problem for Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh P</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>Though I am not using Adwords,
but I am totally against the google ban if people draw visitors and use adsense on their sites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I am not using Adwords,<br />
but I am totally against the google ban if people draw visitors and use adsense on their sites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Smethurst</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Smethurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>It can&#039;t be good, 
So I write a post about Product X then set up some ad words for the post and on the page I have adwords.
A user comes in from the adwords reads the content decides that they don&#039;t want product X then see an adword for Product Y and clicks it. 
That should be valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can&#8217;t be good,<br />
So I write a post about Product X then set up some ad words for the post and on the page I have adwords.<br />
A user comes in from the adwords reads the content decides that they don&#8217;t want product X then see an adword for Product Y and clicks it.<br />
That should be valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killer Bunny with MS Zune mp3 player. â€“ Computer related blog - Linux Windows Unix system and Making money online</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Killer Bunny with MS Zune mp3 player. â€“ Computer related blog - Linux Windows Unix system and Making money online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>[...] of colors.â€¦ during the last month I&#8217;ve heard SO much about how NOT to swing a golf club, Google Arbitrage and Artistic bunnies, that I cannot really think of a better way to compensate myself then with a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of colors.â€¦ during the last month I&#8217;ve heard SO much about how NOT to swing a golf club, Google Arbitrage and Artistic bunnies, that I cannot really think of a better way to compensate myself then with a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimi</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>Man I hope they don&#039;t get control of Feedburner. They are far reaching enough already. I suppose you can&#039;t turn down the kind of money Google will throw at them, but there has to be some sort of checks and balances going on.

I&#039;m still pretty interested in seeing what Wiki is going to do with their SE project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I hope they don&#8217;t get control of Feedburner. They are far reaching enough already. I suppose you can&#8217;t turn down the kind of money Google will throw at them, but there has to be some sort of checks and balances going on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still pretty interested in seeing what Wiki is going to do with their SE project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msdanielle</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>msdanielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>yea i just saw this too. he has a good point. i think what google&#039;s over-arching goal is is to get rid of mfa sites. made-for-adsense, or made-for-affiliate, sites. i&#039;d like to see the landing pages of these guys who are getting the boot!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea i just saw this too. he has a good point. i think what google&#8217;s over-arching goal is is to get rid of mfa sites. made-for-adsense, or made-for-affiliate, sites. i&#8217;d like to see the landing pages of these guys who are getting the boot!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>Of late google&#039;s been pretty busy..offering daily trend updates, being rumored to be in talks to buy Chicago-based Feedburner, partnering up with Salesforce and now giving the boot to Adsense Arbitrageurs !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of late google&#8217;s been pretty busy..offering daily trend updates, being rumored to be in talks to buy Chicago-based Feedburner, partnering up with Salesforce and now giving the boot to Adsense Arbitrageurs !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrich</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>I saw that same thing that Spud is talking about.  And I&#039;d bet he&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that same thing that Spud is talking about.  And I&#8217;d bet he&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msdanielle.com/google-to-give-the-virtual-boot-to-arbitrageurs/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>The first I heard of this was on Shoemoney.com when he did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/05/19/adsense-arbitrage-just-the-facts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this video post&lt;/a&gt;. Fortunately, he played down all these fears, and I hope he&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first I heard of this was on Shoemoney.com when he did <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/05/19/adsense-arbitrage-just-the-facts" rel="nofollow">this video post</a>. Fortunately, he played down all these fears, and I hope he&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
